More Pages: Institute Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93


A wonderful reference

ChallengingNow the negative side (if that is the correct term) which has more to do with the heavy hand view that Christian Reconstructionism seems to take. I personally do not believe that only Christians should be elected to office or that women shouldn't be elected. Since I know non-Christians and women who do a darn good job in secular and public jobs. I do not believe in a theocracy since I am a one G-d believer. But the books he writes should be read, if for no other reason that people should know what he believed.
Much needed revival of true Chriatian scholarship
Unvarished Eternal Truths vs. Trendy Church Culture

Pretty good courseHowever, I'm glad I took some classes beforehand because the book is pretty weak. There's not much in the way of explanation of grammatical points, and the size of the book could have been reduced by a third by removing the useless pronunciation guide. (Why don't I just listen to the cassettes to get the pronunciation?). If you buy this, you'd better shell out for a grammar guide, too.
Despite the book, I liked the tapes well enough to order the next set.
Solid But Not Perfect
An excellent teach yourself course

Ick.This book covered mostly pathologically shy people, and painfully shy people. The end of the first half of the book pointed out that shy people have greater tendencies to become murderers, rapist, see prostitutes, etc. It freaked me out so badly that I put the book down.
I picked it up, read through the second half, and surprise, surprise, it was a bunch of self-exploratory psychobabble exercises. While this might have been fine for someone who has not thought about who they are, where they came from, and what they're doing now, I found the exercises useless, as I know very well who I am.
I knew beforehand the particular reasons that I don't like to be around people, so this book wasn't much help. It was interesting to read the interviews with nearly terminally shy people, but other than that... there was almost no reason for me to read this book. It brought me little enjoyment, and even less revelation.
I'm sure there are people who haven't looked at their lives, and their surroundings, and their thoughts about themselves and others. Perhaps to them, this may be a wake-up call.
not that goodIf you want a great book about shyness, then you should buy "Shyness: A bold new approach" By Bernardo J. Carducci, Ph.D. His book is recent and the information provided is totally up todate. He doesn't think shyness is a character defect that needs to be treated, etc.
Outdated but still the best

A Requirement for PMP exam, but not everything.
A necessary [thing] to pass the PMP.For the longest time, almost everyone who has taken the PMP exam felt that this was a badly written book. There are two reasons for this.
The first one is that typically nobody likes to read a table of contents. So, why did PMI do this? Because of the vastness of the project management knowledge out there and the difficulty of covering it all in one book, PMI has chosen to only outline what is out there.
The second and more important reason is that the authors/editors did a poor job of connecting these various topics and outline the ideas in a fashion that does not make sense!
Books are written so that you have to read the chapters serially from the beginning to the end of the book. Or in some unique cases, the chapters can be read independently without losing the author's train of thought. This is the only book I have ever read that follows neither principle! I believe this is the reason almost every single reader is confused when trying to read the book.
I have talked to several people who have passed the PMP exam and it is clear that everyone struggles through this book a few times before finding the correct order to read the chapters in the book for the material to stick.
I think it is best to use this as a reference on your bookshelf while you are reading other books on project management. Once you have sufficient experience in the project management field and feel comfortable with the various knowledge areas, it is time to read this book cover to cover and come up with your own order in which to read the different chapters.
My suggestion for the order in which to read the chapters? Read the first three chapters as they are an overview to project management and it is not that confusing. The rest of the chapters are supposed to address the different knowledge areas in an independent fashion. But this isn't true! The different knowledge areas are not independent. They are connected through the five different project management process groups! If you want to make sense of this book, it is better to follow the order of the process groups. It may mean flipping back and forth between different chapters but it works.
This is the only way that I have been able to retain the material long after taking the PMP exam. I hope this particular order works for you but if it doesn't, I suggest trying different ordering of the chapters to find whatever works for you. Do not assume that you have poor project management skills if the material doesn't make sense. It is not you, but the book that is the problem in understanding project management. I wish you the best of luck in overcoming this hurdle. Bottom line, you have to read this book in order to pass the PMP.
By the way, if you are a PMI member, you can download an electronic copy of this book free...The print functionality on this free Adobe Acrobat file is disabled though. Personally, I have always preferred the print version for reference books like this one. Good luck!
As the name says, a guide.The book does not try to be fun; it is very technical and general. As I said before, it is almost an index: covers a lot of topics, does not get into the details of almost anything. I would have liked it to include an example of how to put all the techniques together.
I had to read the 1996 edition for a course, and the 2000 edition in preparation for the PMP test. The first time it was a lot more difficult to finish the book. In between, I read "Information Technology Project Management" by Katy Schwalbe, and it helped a lot. It explains the PMBOK with anecdotes and stories, as well as examples and exercises, and after getting the basics the PMBOK is a lot more readable. I highly recommend reading Shwalbe's book first.
And if you just want to start studying Project Management, I think "Fundamentals of Project Management", by Lewis, is almost a "Quick Guide", but ideal for busy people, since it is very short and easy to read.
I rate the book four stars because it is not exactly a page-turner. It takes determination to read it from cover to cover.


can't do better for an audio based courseI'm almost done French level 1 and I'll say that they are great. Yes, the technique is brute-force, but it does work. It greatly removes one's hesitancy to speak (improves confidence) and perfects pronunciation. Best for me: it's already smoothed over several tenacious problems I was having what had seemed to be "tricky" grammar points -which the Pimsleur ones didn't cover adequately-... to me, this seems a sign that it's very well designed to get students through the rough spots.
I should also mention that the instruction book doesn't come out any say it, but the way to use it most effectively is: (1) totally memorize a dialog, then do the drills... (2) if you can respond "in time" (i.e., before the answer comes) at least 80% of the time, you move on. Otherwise, go back. I would strongly recommend that when using these (or any audio course) that you respond at full speaking volume, if at all possible... there's a big difference between "responding" to a question in your head and actually responding.
Lastly, years ago I used the Barron's Korean and had two observations: Again, they totally perfect pronunciation, etc... my offices colleagues were totally blown away when a non-asian walked in speaking their language. However, I gave them up thinking the technique was "too boring." In fact, I don't currently have that issue with the French ones. Moral: if you really like the target language, it makes all the difference in the world.
Will try to post a followup.
An excellent beginners course.
Arguably the best French self-study courseI really like this venerable old course, the very same one used to train government agents in the Foreign Service. What sets it apart from more modern, streamlined courses is its emphasis on spoken French. If you're not fortunate enough to live in France or any other French-speaking country, the next best thing is to listen, and listen, and listen some more. There's just no substitute for training your ears in listening comprehension, and these cassettes serve that purpose more than adequately.
This course originally came out in 1960! Not surprisingly, some of the French used is a bit dated and overly formal for today's quick-fix crowd. But if you make a conscientious effort with this course, it still delivers results. And if you're especially ambitious in your studies, you'll acquire the coveted spot-on French accent without even realizing it. How many courses can deliver this kind of aesthetic result?
But the main reason why I'd strongly advise purchasing this course is that Barron's offers it at a truly bargain price.( ). Need I say more?
A time-tested, dependable, flexible course that delivers results--and at an affordable price, too. Sounds like a good deal to me. Purchase this course, apply yourself, and you'll be amazed with the results.


Instant AngerI benefited in absolutely no way from this text.
It works... only of you keep at it
Not for MEMORY only, but for the modus operandi of the MIND!

Good but incompleteI have a major problem with this guide, however. There are many colleges I wanted to read about but they were not included in the book. For example Binghmapton University is covered but none of the other schools in the SUNY system are. There was nothing about several goog schools in Pennsylvania such as Franklin and Marshall, Dickinson, Bucknell, Lehigh, Gettysburg, etc. Ohio State University is covered well but there is nohing on other major schools in Ohio's state system such as Ohio University and Miami University (or for that matter, Universitey of Miami in Florida). The book is good, as far as it goes, but many, if not most of the colleges I was interested in reading about are not profiled.
good book, but I wish there was more in itAlmost none of the schools profiled here have survived it -- Grove City, and Case Western, are the two that I remember having done so. Why are these other schools still open? Why would anybody go to Oberlin college, where the music department teaches that oral sex on stage is good enough for a master's exhibition of classical music? It's just baffling why people would pay 40 grand for what they can get in a toilet in any bar for free.
A "must have" for families with college-bound studentsThe typical high school junior receives dozens of glossy college viewbooks in the mail from the time they complete their first PSAT throughout their senior year. These viewbooks would have you believe that there's not a college out there that doesn't have very small classes, bright and multi-talented students, professors who are at each student's beck and call, and (let's not forget the classic) a class or two held outdoors, preferably with a beach nearby.
While the picture is a pretty one, it's not complete. This book clues you in about what education is really like at some of the nation's most revered colleges and universities. The editors approach the book from the viewpoint that a classic liberal arts undergraduate education is the most valuable to the individual and society so their natural focus is on how well this type of education is provided at various institutions. A classic liberal arts education highlights Western Civilization's developments in math, science and literature and this book's editors are determined in revealing how closely each college's core curriculum reflects that bent.
If, instead, you're looking for a college or university where the dogma is politically correct, where there is no absolute truth and where students call the shots, you might still appreciate reading this book because it is clear in explaining just what campuses feature that type of education.
Each school is reviewed through interviews with current professors and students, with detailed evaluations of curriculum, with a bit of the school's history and goals, and even, in some cases, by checking out which library sections are well-stocked and with what type of books. The editors reveal each school's highly-politicized departments, if any, as well as what student life is really like.
While I would have liked to have seen more colleges reviewed in this book, the authors do a good job of targeting the "name" schools and also including many lesser-known institutions which the editors feel are doing a an exceptional job in educating students. This helped our family incredibly because it steered us to several schools we might not have considered.
How accurate is the book? I can only speak anecdotally; we have a son who attends Thomas Aquinas College (we first heard of it in this book) and, after a year of school, he re-read the review of his school and found it absolutely on target. With such a solid correlation between what was written about TAC and the way it actually is, I have faith in the editors' reviews of the other schools in this book.
In short, this book is a real gem, with solid information that is much more revealing than the typical college guidebook.


What's up with the Romanization?
Very Good Korean ProgramI totally recommend this course.
IncredibleThis audiolingual course is a wonder. If you have the patience to put up with the seemingly mindless drills, this one course will give you a strong, unconscious foundation in Korean grammar. Your grammar will be as instinctive as Daniel's front blocks in "The Karate Kid" after he waxes all those cars.
I completely disagree with those who say that one must learn Hangul first. To this day I read the English street signs because, even after seven years, I'm faster at reading roman letters. Why does this matter? If you follow audiolingual methodology, you're forced to repeat things until you can say them at native speed. You're cautioned not to proceed to the next lesson until you have mastered the current one at native speed. So, when you talk to people, even in your fledgling stage, they're going to understand you and, in Korea at least, give you the praise that will keep you studying.
If you learn Hangul first you won't acquire that ability to repeat so quickly, as you'll be trudging through the--yes, easy and scientific, but more difficult than the roman alphabet for English speakers--Hangul. You'll also be more likely to have one of the boring, occasionally jingoistic books that line the shelves here. This book cuts to the chase: No junk about four seasons and Tangun; all hard, memory-path-building exercises about taking the bus and going out to dinner.
If you put up with negligble faults: the funky roman letters, the guy's bizarre pronunciation (One of my Korean friends thought he was a non-native speaker of Korean), the formality, and the antiquated expressions (this was written a while ago), you'll be fine.
This book is the sine qua non for anyone who can handle, or who has the ability to learn from, the audiolingual method.


Audio Lingual Method Needs RevisionIf you're looking for a German equivalent of Pierre Capretz' outstanding "French in Action," this is not the course for you. But "Mastering German Level I" can improve a learner's facility with the German language.
The concept of long and complicated drills and incessant repetition used throughout this ear-and-tongue method has value for making the language automatic for the non-native speaker. But for rank beginner, this audio lingual method of learning foreign languages--so much in vogue in the 1960s--can be daunting.
The quality of the tapes, unfortunately, can disappoint and mislead the real beginner--as well as the more advanced student--who needs great guidance in pronunciation and inflection. In fact, the poor quality of the audio portion--the very framework for this course--nearly topples the structure that this course is attempting to build.
"Mastering German Level I" desperately needs revision, better quality tapes, and some good proofreading to correct typographical errors in the German and the English. I would not recommend this course for the beginning student.
Conversational German with 12 audio tapesIt is a bit difficult, at first, to relate the audio tapes to the book text because the book has content that is not in the tapes.
I recommend that you use How to Pronounce German Correctly, the book and audio tape, while you use Mastering German Level 1.
A classic masterpiece!